Harrie Nak
03-06-2010, 21:41
Affliction Entertainment filed a countersuit against M-1 Global, the management and promotional group that reps Fedor Emelianenko, in Los Angeles federal court on Thursday, asking for declaratory relief on the validity of a "Consultation Agreement" signed into by the two parties in April 2008 -- allegedly under false pretenses. Affliction is also asking the court to rule that M-1 Global return $2.4 million in consulting fees it was paid in conjunction with two Affliction MMA events the two groups co-promoted in July 2008 and January 2009.
In the filings obtained by Sherdog.com, Affliction claims it, under M-1 Global's directive, entered into two separate agreements with Emelianenko and the Holland-based organization to procure the services of the world's No. 1 heavyweight as a headliner for three events.
According to Affliction, the California-based promotion inked a "Fight Agreement" that tendered $300,000 to Emelianenko per bout he participated in, while Affliction was directed to pay the remaining $1.2 million of Emelianenko's $1.5 million asking purse per bout directly to M-1 Global under the auspice of a "Consultation Agreement."
"The reason for the two agreements, Affliction was told, was for personal tax implications," reads the countersuit.
Affliction claims no consultation was ever agreed upon or given by the M-1 Global group for the two events.
"Because the consulting agreement was a sham contract designed to avoid tax obligations, M-1 had no obligations to perform pursuant to the consulting agreement and therefore rendered no performance under the consulting agreement," alleges Affliction's filings.Meer hier (http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/6/1/1496046/afflictions-counter-suit-of-fedor)!
In the filings obtained by Sherdog.com, Affliction claims it, under M-1 Global's directive, entered into two separate agreements with Emelianenko and the Holland-based organization to procure the services of the world's No. 1 heavyweight as a headliner for three events.
According to Affliction, the California-based promotion inked a "Fight Agreement" that tendered $300,000 to Emelianenko per bout he participated in, while Affliction was directed to pay the remaining $1.2 million of Emelianenko's $1.5 million asking purse per bout directly to M-1 Global under the auspice of a "Consultation Agreement."
"The reason for the two agreements, Affliction was told, was for personal tax implications," reads the countersuit.
Affliction claims no consultation was ever agreed upon or given by the M-1 Global group for the two events.
"Because the consulting agreement was a sham contract designed to avoid tax obligations, M-1 had no obligations to perform pursuant to the consulting agreement and therefore rendered no performance under the consulting agreement," alleges Affliction's filings.Meer hier (http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/6/1/1496046/afflictions-counter-suit-of-fedor)!