PDA

View Full Version : Officiele uitslag, Remy vs Le Banner



gerrie
30-06-2006, 12:16
Name of the tournament concerned FieLDS K-1 WORLD GP 2006 in AMSTERDAM
Date of the match concerned May 13th, 2006
Venue of the match concerned Amsterdam Arena
The match concerned Jerome Le Banner
(France / Le Banner X tream Team) VS Remy Bonjasky
(Holland / Mejiro Gym)


[Preconditions]

1. Rule committee was held.
Per objections raised by the fighter Banner, active and authorized K-1 referees held a meeting to verify the match based on the current K-1GP judgment criteria. They discussed watching the video of the match.
2. Composition of verification judges
6 Japanese and 2 Americans
3. Composition of referees and judges at the sight
The referee was Japanese and 3 judges were Dutch.
4. Judging on the day of the match
The fighter Remy won by a decision of 30-30, 29-28, 30-28, and 2-0.

[Verification]

<Round 1>
[The two judges supported Remy with 10-9. The remaining one judged10-10.]
The two judges claim that they supported Remy’s clean hit (single-shot, counter right middle)

Comparison of clean hits Punch Kick
The fighter Remy 0 10
The fighter Banner 7 3

[Verification]

The verification hardly showed the difference of clean hits between the two. Although Remy tended to be attacked by Banner’s pressure at the latter half of the round, it turned out that there was no difference among 1, 2, and 3, when grading according to K-1 judgment criteria of Down (1), Damage (2), Clean Hit (3), and Aggressive (4). As for 4, all the judges concerned agreed to the judgment of 10-10 as there was not enough difference to give 1 point for Banner.

<Round 2>
[Same as the previous round, the same two judges (identical people) supported Remy at 10-9. The remaining one judged 10-10.]
The local judge claims that he supports Remy’s clean hit (counter right middle).

Comparison of clean hits Punch Kick
Remy 0 6
Banner 4 2

[Verification]

On the round 2, both fighters were so defensive that referees gave them warnings. Majority of opinions said that Remy, who kept stepping back aiming at counter, seemed to bring a passive game, however, there was no difference with Banner who only put a pressure on at the front and could not attack by arm. All concerned agreed that it was fair enough to judge 10-10.

<Round 3>
[Two judges supported 10-10. One supported Banner with 10-9.]
Two judges supported 10-10, judging that there was no difference between the two. One supported Banner, considering Banner’s damage by left middle kick.

Comparison of clean hits Punch Kick
Remy 0 10
Banner 10 7

[Verification]

While Remy stepped back aiming at counter many times, he gained advantages with clean hits and aggressive points. Also, Banner’s left middle in the middle of the round obviously gave damages to the opponent. All concerned agreed that Banner won the round with 10-9.


[Conclusion]

There was a discrepancy in terms of interpretation of “Clean Hits� among the referees at the sight who actually made judgment(they think that kick is more important than punch and do not ask whether there is a will to “defeat� the opponent), which do not follow the K-1 current judgment standard(according to the current K-1 judgment standard, open attack aiming at counter or single-shot attack are not highly respected).
The left middle kick by Banner at the round 3 was an obvious advantage associated with damages. It was a refereeing mistake that this attack was not counted.
Composition of referees at the sight completely ignored the impartiality.
As a result of the above verification, Board of K-1 Authorized Referees certifies that the winner is the fighter Jerome Le Banner, with the score of 30-29, and advocates that the judging of this match should be reversed and the official record should be revised.

Also, in order to avoid future refereeing mistakes like this time, we would like to hold seminars before and after matches held around the world, aiming at standardizing judging criteria at K-1 authorized matches, and to cultivate talented and fair referees.

Board of K-1 Authorized Referees
Rule Director Atsushi Onari
Rule Supervisor Nobuaki Kukuda

Anonymous
30-06-2006, 12:18
Anders nieuws: 10 mei 1940 Duitsland valt Nederland binnen!

Halfshot
30-06-2006, 12:20
Anders nieuws: 10 mei 1940 Duitsland valt Nederland binnen!

LOL

Blijk dat er ook mensen op de maan gaan landen he

Cave
30-06-2006, 12:25
Anders nieuws: 10 mei 1940 Duitsland valt Nederland binnen!

LOL

Blijk dat er ook mensen op de maan gaan landen he

Dat laatste kan dus echt niet! Dan moet er eerst een gat in de ozonlaag komen anders kun je helemaal niet van de aarde af komen.

gerrie
30-06-2006, 12:40
zal allemaal wel als ouwe koek overkomen, maar het is net via hun web-site officieel bekrachtigd.... onder news 30 - juni. dus dacht ik... deel het effe.....

Anonymous
30-06-2006, 12:55
zal allemaal wel als ouwe koek overkomen, maar het is net via hun web-site officieel bekrachtigd.... onder news 30 - juni. dus dacht ik... deel het effe.....

Dat meeltje van je is minstens 4 weken oud! :?

ICON
30-06-2006, 12:56
iig bedankt voor de moeite gerrie

AJSIJAMATU
01-07-2006, 01:07
De revised uitslag stond vlak na de K1 Arena al op de site van Le Banner. Tjsa, wat kan je er verder op zeggen? (stil ...)

PigDog
01-07-2006, 02:13
Bedankt Gerrie!

Remco
01-07-2006, 09:43
Bedankt voor de info! Laat ze maar zeuren.