Minister Vogelaar: islam nestelt zich hier

[Guru]

Minister voor Wonen, Wijken en Integratie Ella Vogelaar zegt dat de islam op den lange duur zo diep in de Nederlandse samenleving zal zijn genesteld, dat Nederland een land wordt dat uitgaat van een 'joods-christelijke-islamitische traditie'. De PvdA-bewindsvrouw zegt dat vandaag in een interview met dagblad Trouw.

''Eeuwen geleden kwam de joodse gemeenschap naar Nederland en nu zeggen we: Nederland is een land dat is gevormd door joods-christelijke tradities. Ik kan me voorstellen dat we een vergelijkbaar proces krijgen met de islam'', aldus Vogelaar.

De minister zegt dat ze tijdens haar kabinetsperiode hoopt een einde te maken ''aan het negativisme en de angst voor de islam. Ik wil moslims helpen zich hier thuis te voelen. Islam en moslims moeten zich hier kunnen wortelen, juist omdat moslims ook burgers zijn van dit land.'' Vogelaar ziet er ook geen enkel bezwaar in als de (lokale) overheid steun geeft, ook financiële, aan religieuze instellingen van nieuwe Nederlanders. ''Zolang je sociaal-maatschappelijke doelen subsidieert, en geen religieuze activiteiten. Anders zou je een grens overgaan.''

De PvdA-bewindsvrouw, die met haar uitspraken een heel ander signaal afgeeft naar moslimgroeperingen dan diverse politici in de afgelopen jaren, spreek wat betreft integratie van een 'wederzijds proces waarbij culturen elkaar beïnvloeden en stimuleren'. ''Het is belangrijk dat zo'n grote groep zich wortelt in onze samenleving, er een onlosmakelijk onderdeel van wordt.'' Wel blijft ze voorstander van de onder het vorige kabinet ingezette verplichting tot inburgeren en het leren van de Nederlandse taal.





Vogelaar vergeet hier gemakshalve even dat de Koran geweld tegen ongelovigen predikt.
Opsluiten die linkse TEEF!!!

[Chico]

de bijbel is ook echt een voorbeeld van vredelievendheid... (en ja... oude testament moet je ook meerekenen)

[Chico]

En als we het over het christendom hebben, was dat niet het geloof waarvan de religieuze leider in rome vindt dat harry potter boeken kinderen op verkeerde pad brengen?

of dat condooms geen goed middel is tegen aids?

jeezz.. nee christendom is echt een intellectueel goed ontwikkelde religie.. poe zeg...

[Biiyen]

:hitler: AUSWEISS BITTE

[Chico]

sorry.. havo 3.... 4.5 voor duits op me rapport.... havo 4.. 3.5 voor duits op me rapport... niet echt één van mijn mooiste momenten :(

[Bud S]

Vogelaar vergeet hier gemakshalve even dat de Koran geweld tegen ongelovigen predikt.
Opsluiten die linkse TEEF!!!

als ze nou es met jou beginnen vind ik het best ;)

[FOCUS]

http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001451843/0001451843_0005.gif http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001451843/0001451843_0006.gif http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001451843/0001451843_0007.gif http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001451843/0001451843_0008.gif http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001451843/0001451843_0009.gif

[FOCUS]

many and varied and both natural and human. However, most of the wetland reported to Congress on a 10-year cycle. This initiation of a aided drafting functionality Relatinal functionality Relational functionality GIS functinality Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989). Trend analysis continues to help refine the information available on the status and trends of the nation's , L. M. (1982). Wetlands and deepwater habitats: A new classification, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe (1979). Classification of Wetlands & Deepwater Habitats of the United States , Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Dahl, T. E. (1990). Wetland Losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's, Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Dahl, T. E. (1992). Wetland Status and Trends—The Link to Remote Sensing, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, St. Petersburg, Florida. Dahl, T. E., and C. E. Johnson (1991). Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States, Mid-1970's to mid-1980's, Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. DOI Office of Inspector General (1992). Audit Report: National Wetlands Inventory Mapping Activities, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Report No. 92-I-790, Washington, D.C., 54 pp. Ducks Unlimited (1992). Wetland Bacteria Removes Nitrates, Improve Water Quality, Ducks Unlimited 1992 (January/February). Duffy, M. (1991). Need friends in high places? Time, November 4, 1991. Environmental Protection Agency (1987). Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual-Volume I Rationale, Wetland Parameters, and Overview of Jurisdictional Approach, Washington D.C. FGDC (1991). A National Geographic Information Resource: The Spatial Foundation of the Information-Based Society, FGDC First Annual Report to the Director of OMB. FGDC (1992). Subcommittee on Wetlands working document—Application of satellite data for mapping and monitoring wetlands, Washington, D.C. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (1989). Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Kusler, J. A. (1983). Our National Wetland Heritage Handbook: A Protection Guidebook, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. Kusler, J., (1992). Wetland delineation: An issue of science or politics, Environment 34 (2). Maxted, J. R. (1990). Wetland mapping supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Coastal Wetland Mapping Programs, Biological Report 90 (18), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. Nelson, E. H., K. H. Hughes, and R. O. Morgenweek (1990). Memorandum to E.S. Goldstein-Report on the Wetlands Inventory Workshop, dated December 11, 1990), U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service National Oceanographic Data Center, Washington D.C.
OCR for page 167
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation Niemann, B. J., Jr. (1992). Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Technology: Modernizing the Wetland Permitting Process, CRSS Architects, Inc. , Houston Texas. Niering, W. A. (1986). Wetlands, The Audubon Society, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York. Office of Technology Assessment (1984). Wetlands: Their Use & Regulation , U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Pope, C. (1991). Wetlands definition blasted, The State (Columbia, S.C.), Aug. 27, 1991. SCS (1992). Remote Sensing Wetland Recertification Project: Interim Report, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., 6 pp. Seligmann, J., and M. Hager (1991). What on Earth is a Wetland? The White House Seeks a New Definition, Newsweek, Aug. 26, 1991. The State (1991). Proposed "Wetlands" definition draws fire, The State (Columbia, S.C.) May 15, 1991. Tiner, R. W. (1984). Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Trends, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Survey, Washington D.C. Urban Land Institute (1985). Wetlands: Mitigating and Regulating Development Impacts, Urban Land Institute. Want, W. L. (1991). Law of Wetlands Regulation, Clark Boardman Co., Ltd., New York. Wetlands Research Program (1987). Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y87-1, Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Wilen, B. O., and H. R. Pywell (1992). Remote Sensing the Nation's Wetlands—The National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Zinn, J., and C. Copeland (1992). Wetland Issues in the 102nd Congress, CRS Issue Brief, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, Washington D.C.
OCR for page 168
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation This page in the original is blank.

Representative terms from entire chapter: wetland data

[Biiyen]

Focus wat ben je allemaal aan het posten... ???

[Justinian]

Focus wat ben je allemaal aan het posten... ???
Waarschijnlijk copy/paste, net als Guru ;)

[Sjaak]

Minister voor Wonen, Wijken en Integratie Ella Vogelaar zegt dat de islam op den lange duur zo diep in de Nederlandse samenleving zal zijn genesteld, dat Nederland een land wordt dat uitgaat van een 'joods-christelijke-islamitische traditie'.

Is dat PvdA wijf gestoord of zo :boos:slaat nergens op.

Nederland moet gewoon Nederland blijven ongeacht wie er komt wonen.

[Bud S]

''Eeuwen geleden kwam de joodse gemeenschap naar Nederland en nu zeggen we: Nederland is een land dat is gevormd door joods-christelijke tradities. Ik kan me voorstellen dat we een vergelijkbaar proces krijgen met de islam'', aldus Vogelaar.

!!!

wat is daar raar aan ???

[FOCUS]

ja ik denk ik kijk es hoe dat voelt, copy-paste,
is echt lekker gevoel, :cool2:

[FOCUS]

Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation State of Connecticut (22a-38 Connecticut General Statutes) Wetlands means land, including submerged land, which consists of any of the soil types designated as poorly drained, very poorly drained, alluvial or flood plain by the National Cooperative Soils Survey, as may be amended from time to time by the Soil Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. State of California (California Coastal Act of 1976, Section 30121) Lands within the coastal zone that may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freshwater marshes, open or closed brackish marshes, swamps, mudflats, and fens. As noted earlier, before this federal interest some states assumed responsibility for the regulation of wetlands. By the mid-1970s additional states also became interested in the protection of wetlands. Even though federal law imposes national consistency, wetland protection has been increasingly augmented by state law (Want, 1991). At present, 27 states have some form of wetland law: explicit wetland regulations, regulationsincluded in coastal zone management, or regulations included in other natural resource management provisions, such as shoreline, beach, and sand protection (Want, 1991). Regulation of wetlands and their associated definitional requirements has become a complex regulatory arena with numerous judicial decisions interpreting these regulations. This has occurred at all levels of government (Want, 1991). As part of this process of regulation and protection, attorneys, environmentalists, realtors, corporate professionals, scientists, and planners have become involved in the definition, regulation, management, alteration, and restoration of wetlands. INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS What are the Information Requirements? Obviously the requirements for a wetland information system depend on how wetlands are defined. This definitional task is a scientific, social, legal, and political task. Definitions need to be agreed upon in both the

OCR for page 158
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation Elimination System (40 CFR Part 122.2) and Section 404 program (40 CFR Parts 230.3 and 232.2) (Maxted, 1990). As mentioned earlier, states have also taken responsibility for wetland protection associated with their public trust responsibilities. For example, in 1980 Wisconsin as part of its Wisconsin Shoreland Management Program (N.R. 115) extended its land-use zoning authority to include wetlands associated with its streams, rivers, and lakes. The information associated with this stage is initially ordinal in that wetlands are now legislatively different from other lands (e.g., uplands). To assist in the policy formulation phase, status and trends of the nation's wetlands are now being tracked by the FWS and reported to Congress on a 10-year cycle. This initiation of a systematic sample of wetland environments established the ability to conduct statistical manipulations of the data base.
OCR for page 159
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation TABLE A.9 Evaluation of Information Technology Diffusion Awareness Building Stage Policy Formulation Stage Definitional Formulation Stage Planning Management and Analysis Stage Private Land Regulation Stage Types of information Data Trends (legislation) Rules (administrative) Entities (small scale) Entities (large Scale) Types of measurement and analysis Descriptive Classification Statistical Case by case entity mapping prediction Case by case entity mapping prediction Level of analysis Nominal Ordinal Ordinal Interval Ordinal Interval Ordinal Interval Ratio Type of information technology used Maps Photography Computer aided drafting functionality Relatinal functionality Relational functionality GIS functinality Land information system (LIS) functionality OCR for page 160
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation Definitional Formulation Stage The regulatory definitional stage requires the establishment of administrative rules and the formulation of reliably measurable definitions. The results of this process have a major impact on the data and information content required to implement the states' public policy. Examples of this definitional process includes Classification of Wetlands & Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al., 1979); Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Wetlands Research Program, 1987); Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Environmental Protection Agency, 1987), and the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989). Trend analysis continues to help refine the information available on the status and trends of the nation's wetlands and to continue policy debate. Planning, Management, and Analysis Stage The implementation of legislative and Congressional intent and the associated data requirements is the management tool during this stage. From the viewpoint of planning, management, and analysis, these trend and entity data collected by the FWS as part of the EWRA are used to establish the base line for determining the actual abundance or scarcity and the rate of conversion of wetlands (Tiner, 1984). Consequently, this analysis of trends forms the basis for much of the public debate over wetlands. For example, the trends data were the predominant source used by the Council of Environmental Quality in its Environmental Trends Report on wetlands and wildlife (CEQ, 1989). Because of the value of the

OCR for page 161
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation data, the monitoring cycle and the reporting cycle to Congress as mandated by the EWRA needs to be reduced (e.g., 5 years versus 10 years) through reconciliation with the agencies involved in statistical trend and status analysis. It would also be valuable to intensify the national sampling and to produce statistically significant regional estimates on the status and trends of wetlands. Private Land Regulation Stage This final stage, private land regulation, is that of imposing stated public policy on privately held lands. Information requirements become more specific and more demanding. Entity mapping becomes integrated with other data such as property. GIS technology and automated land records integration become important factors. Increased analytical capability is expected. This evolution of wetland information diffusion is in a state of flux (Figure A.5). As the definitional process affects the land development rights on privately held land, the public debate accelerates. This interaction, even though troublesome to the information community, in reality constitutes the implementation process, that process being the difference between the policy of no net loss and the political process of what society and private land owners are willing to endure. It is important that the information diffusion process be understood so that consistent and durable policy leading to an enhanced NSDI be formulated. Although there have been extensive efforts to define the critical properties associated with wetlands, a politically agreeable decision on the subset to be regulated remains at the center of the wetland controversy. This issue of what is a wetland has become a major public debate because it concerns private land. This controversy is further fueled by the administration's stated goal of no net loss. Where the line from wet to dry is drawn has a major impact on how much wetland exists, how much needs protection, and what constitutes no net loss. This issue is further compounded by those who assert that wetlands serve different functions and that only the most important functions need attention. This is even further compounded by the issue of inherent wetland biological and botanical quality. For example, some wetlands have been invaded by exotic wetland plants, such as Purple Loosestrife. Examples of the debate are represented by the following quotes from a selection of newspapers and magazines.
OCR for page 162
Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation FIGURE A.5 Proposed model for diffusion of wetland information. 'The changes being proposed are political changes not based on good science.' said South Carolina Wildlife Federation executive director . . . (C. Pope, The State, August 27, 1991) A draft of the new document given to the Associated Press by a member of the administration says the previous definition (Interagency Wetlands Manual, Maron, 1990) 'grossly exaggerated' the country's real wetlands mostly by not requiring that they be very wet. The current definition (March, 1990) says water must come within 18 inches of the surface for at least 7 days of the growing season (this is when chemically soils become hydric in composition and can support hydric vegetation). . . The draft (EPA's) would be stricter, requiring that land be inundated or saturated all the way to the surface for at least 14 consecutive days in the growing season (The State, [Columbia, S.C.] May 15, 1991). OCR for page 163

[chief108]

Bazooko's Circus is what the whole hep world would be doing Saturday nights if the Nazis had won the war. This was the Sixth Reich.

[chief108]

Few people understand the psychology of dealing with a highway traffic cop. A normal speeder will panic and immediately pull over to the side. This is wrong. It arouses contempt in the cop heart. Make the bastard chase you. He will follow. But he won't know what to make of your blinker signal that says you are about to turn right. This is to let him know you're pulling off for a proper place to talk. It will take him a moment to realize that he's about to make a 180 degree turn at speed, but you will be ready for it. Brace for the g's, and fast heel-toe work.

[ijsbier]

Het leuke is eigenlijk dat Vogelaar bevestigd wat Wilders roept, Vogelaar vindt het echter leuk. Als Wilders zo iets roept schreeuwt iedereen gelijk dat de beste man dom en bang is of iets dergelijks. Als vogelaar dit zegt hoor je niet veel overtrokken reacties.